My day out at Supersport Park

Posted: December 30, 2010 by The CouchExpert in Cricket, India in South Africa 2010-11

Shelin Krishnan

Supersport Park, Centurion

18 December 2010

A beautiful day for cricket. SA batsmen pummeled India.

Unlike the chaos that usually greets spectators back home in India, people that turn-up to watch sport in South Africa end-up having a good time. The facilities are good, the atmosphere festive and the general mood happy.

Election rally anyone?

You see all sorts of people turning-up to watch the games here – some u can find in an artificial pool chilling with beverage, some cooking food in what is locally called the brai and some fooling around. Here, someone looks to be campaigning for TDP!

Kepler Wessels and Mike Haysman get ready to cover the 3rd day's play

Kepler Wessels and Mike Haysman get ready with their bites at the start of the 3rd day’s play. As it turned out there was great entertainment with 444 runs being scored in the day with Kallis getting to his first double-hundred and de Villiers to the fastest hundred by a South African.

Polly rushing to the com box

Shaun Pollock is a legend. Though he’s from Durban, Polly is massively popular all over South Africa. He secretly would have loved to have had a bowl in the Indian first innings. Still very fit, you can see him rushing upstairs to the commentary box just as the play is about to commence.

Kallis and de Villiers: Heroes of the day

Kallis and de Villiers stride out post-lunch to pile the misery on Indians. de Villiers played the innings of the day, but Kallis is striding out in search of that elusive double-hundred. It was almost festival-like when he got there eventually. 38th time lucky for Jacques!!

Tendulkar strides out post-lunch on day 3

No double-hundred issues for Sachin as such. There was a double for him against the same opposition in a one-dayer earlier this year (there by becoming the first to do so in the history of one-day cricket). Here, he got to his 50th Test hundred. He may not have had a great time of it against Proteas through his career, but nothing to complain about this year. Let’s hope he has many more peaks to scale.

Though it wasn’t particularly a great Test for an Indian fan, it certainly was for an Indian fan in a cricket stadium where your comfort was plenty. A different experience in all, but disappointment aplenty with India’s performance.


Chandrasekhar Jayarama Krishnan

Chennai

15 December 2010

 

If ever there was a vital away tour for the Indian cricket team, it is this one. Having just fallen short of capitalizing on a victory to commence the series with during the last tour, India should provide a significantly sterner test to their hosts than their previous attempt.

After a few weeks of recuperation post-New Zealand tests, it might be supposed that the Indian test specialists (and those who were rested for the NZL ODI series) would feel a touch optimistic about facing a very confident South African side that would pretty much do anything to grab pole position in the ICC test rankings.

This tour will resurface a conceit, popular among many an Indian cricket pessimist, that bouncy wickets would definitely test the skill and technique of most, if not all. This brings back unpleasant memories of the sudden recall of Rahul Dravid as filler to the Indian ODI team before the ICC Champions Trophy – an incident that firmed the lack of faith among selectors about the capabilities of the newer crop of players to handle the short-pitched deliveries.

The current test outfit, however, boasts a great wealth of experience, along with a run of positive results under the guidance of Gary Kirsten over the last 18 months. The positive signs are centric around Indian victories even when the team has looked unimpressive – thanks to marathon performances from select individuals during crucial junctures of test matches.

Over the last two years, the Indian players have proved themselves to be braver than their counterparts. Most gazes will be drawn inevitably towards Virender Sehwag, who is yet to prove his prowess in conditions where he hasn’t had a record to boast since his century on debut. His aggressive opening partner, Gautam Gambhir, would want to carry his ODI form from the New Zealand series into the up-coming tests to re-ascertain why he was voted ICC batsman of the year 2009. The opening pair can easily claim to be the best to have existed since Langer and Hayden, and the South Africans are very well aware of it. Much will depend on the sort of starts provided by these two.

The Indian middle order, however, has a peculiar case to bring in to the table – three of the four players could quite possibly, and I reemphasize quite possibly, be touring South Africa for the last time in their careers. The seasoned veterans, Dravid, Tendulkar and Laxman, would want to use their gathered experiences over the previous tours to ensure that, along with bidding adieu to South Africa with memorable performances, the bigger objective of retaining the top spot in the ICC rankings must be met. And one can’t argue why this proposition may seem farfetched, for if there was ever a time that India can stamp its authority over the South Africans, it is this very moment.

Moving down the order, questions over a rampaging Suresh Raina, the only Indian to have scored a century in every format of the game, will receive clear-cut responses as these wickets in South Africa, hopefully, will be a far cry away from the dreary run-feasts that he has been a part of in the longer format of the game. His susceptibility to the short ball, a well documented weakness of his, is bound to be exploited by Steyn and Morkel, and how he faces up to that barrage of bouncers will be a true test of his character and technique. Probably, the fact that the likes of M Vijay and Pujara are banging the doors as hard as they can, would help him take his game to another level.

Astonishingly, Vijay hasn’t played a test since scoring his maiden hundred against Australia earlier this year. Pujara dazzled on his debut with an aggressive 72 in the second innings of the Bangalore test to seal the series against Australia. Consistent domestic performances had finally paid off for the Saurashtra batsman – it is not for no reason that he is considered to be the replacement for Rahul Dravid in the Indian setup.

With Dravid and Laxman, arguably cricket’s most renowned pair of middle-order heavyweights, approaching the fag end of their careers, the exposure provided to Vijay and Pujara will play a very key role in their developments as cricketers – especially with away tours to the West Indies, England and Australia in the calendar year to come.

Both these batsmen will be vying for a taste of the South African medicine, and the form of Suresh Raina would prove inversely proportional to their chances of making it into the playing eleven. The competition for a place in the Indian XI is at its most intense, and nothing can prove to be a better headache for the selectors than the situation they find themselves in now.

As captain, MS Dhoni knows the price that champions pay to retain their positions. The Australian avalanche of late would do well to remind him, and the selectors, as to how the transition needs to be handled over the years to come. His own form has not been the best of late, and he’d do well to remove any elements of doubts from the minds of those who have started to look at him as the Brearley of Indian cricket – captain MSD considerably outweighing batsman MSD.

In all probability, Harbhajan is likely to play the role of a lone spinner in an attack that would see three pacers – Zaheer (if fit), Ishant and Sreeshant – irking to test the bounce that these wickets have in store. The curator has been smart enough to warn in advance that if the weather continues to remain hot, the loss of moisture will make these wickets resemble any other docile wicket often criticized elsewhere. Nevertheless, to challenge the batting trio of Amla, Kallis and de Villiers, all in supreme form of late, would require a skill far superior than that of the ability to extract bounce and swing – patience.

How cleverly these bowlers and captain MSD handle the situation will prove a testimony to our ranking on the top – much along the lines of Nagpur 2008 against Australia. Sreeshant, in particular, would look to repeat his feat in Johannesburg during the last tour – possibly over all the three tests. Harbhajan, who has been in better form with the bat than the ball of late, would want to revisit his memories from 2001 and work towards branding himself as an off-spinner who can bat quite brilliantly.

As much as anything, the changing fortunes of Indian cricket will look to use this tour to trampoline their way to gather a considerable lead atop the ICC rankings. The larger picture would require the attention to turn away from Tendulkar’s personal milestone and look at winning in this unconquered territory, for if the latter happens, the former is bound to have materialized somewhere along the way.

Character has always been the critical issue and cricket, and this Indian team comes into this tour with an extra dosage of it. Umesh Yadav’s stinging bouncer at the little master during the nets a few days ago shows that the youngster feels he can win a place in the XI by showing his character. Whether that was the right way to show it or not is secondary, for he would have been public enemy number 1 had the damages been severe. But all that is being undermined is that this Indian team has the belief to equal the feats achieved by the great West Indian teams of the past through confidence, aggression and character.

WILL YOU EVER WALK ALONE?

Posted: December 30, 2010 by thecognitivenomad in Football, Opinion

Chandrasekhar Jayarama Krishnan

My couch, Chennai

October 23 2010

The argument here is not that Liverpool failed to do what the big clubs achieved quite brilliantly, so far. There are no stunning contrasts in evidence yet; success and failure are to be measured by very narrow differences. Even the best of clubs have been through phases where their positions were placed under severe strain, by either the constant drain of resources or futile administrative battles.

It takes a great deal of blame storming to specifically examine the causes of collapse, often zeroing down on precise moments in which the destinies of empires were determined: A storm over Persia, the fall of Carthage, a battle for Rome and the rusty gates of Anfield Road. The greatest triumph of one is always the beginning of the end of another.

There is little doubt that each powerhouse that followed the last got better and better in its quest for national and continental glory, by devising devious strategies (through foreign ownership mostly) to proclaim its divine throne on the rest of the nation, stepping over the little clubs and holding them by their leash. Even Manchester City, just like those clubs before this era, will rise and fall, sooner or later. And a day will come when people will talk about such clubs as a long gone, forgotten concept, an idea that was meant to grow endlessly and read about in books of football history, remembered for what it was and what it could have become.

Just like Chelsea before them and Real Madrid FC, the men from Maine Road are now busy with their empire building, both in the continental and global branding sense. They are their own destiny; they make rules and break them – an invincible force trying to clutch the footballing world firmly in their hands of dominion. It sounds crudely mercantilistic to express it this way, but money is needed to acquire and protect glory these days.

If there is any trend that keeps coming back, it is that great powers come and go. No one can stay in the top forever. The cricketing heroes from the Caribbean saw it towards the mid-eighties, the Australian ‘invincibles’  have climbed down to P5 in the ICC rankings, few hardly remember the Chicago Bulls of the 90s, and Ferrari aren’t the dominating force they once were.

Liverpool FC has been through, and is going through, a phase where one too many a decision maker appears a fake conservative. There is no organized power that can restore the glory overnight, and with the dependency escalating dramatically, the only solution towards a repeat of ’89 and ’05 is patience. For a football world wary of Capitalist exceptionalism, this cannot happen too soon.

The argument here is not that Liverpool failed to do what the big clubs achieved quite brilliantly, so far. There are no stunning contrasts in evidence yet; success and failure are to be measured by very narrow differences. Even the best of clubs have been through phases where their positions were placed under severe strain, by either the constant drain of resources or futile administrative battles.

If a club over-expands itself strategically, it runs the risk that the potential benefits from expansion may be outweighed by the greatest expense of it all – a dilemma which becomes acute if the market has entered a period of economic decline. Or if the investments have gone haywire.

The story at Anfield has been a misapprehension towards entangling alliances like those with Messrs Hicks & Gillette. In fact, the loyal Kop were only too happy to see them disown the club and pass it over to yet another American capitalist. But it wouldn’t, essentially, enable us to return to the fairly isolationist posture that had brought many a laurel to the Kop.  Liverpool remain a great club because of the European might they once possessed, but they are in no sense an Empire, nor was there any real chance that they would try and become one.

There is still a great manager who should not be thrown out in haste; Hodgson’s basic views are still valuable and provide the basis for a compelling argument that right now, it is not within our right to be involved in the rat race to the top. The Soviets, once, could have quickly overextended to administer all Europe and would have tipped into an even more rapid decline than the one they eventually sank into. The state of affairs at Merseyside are partially polemical, a purpose to portray Liverpool as a club in decline and to cast doubt upon the most faithful of supporters as to where the fulcrum of the problem lies.

It is okay to get drawn into a rat race, provided that you seek to win it and return the club to its days of glory and preparedness afterwards. But we live with change every day, changes that may prove drastic enough to sweep old standards away forever. The great wheel turns, always forward, never back.

Go RCB

Posted: December 30, 2010 by The CouchExpert in Cricket, IPL

Hemanth Mahadevaiah

My couch, Hamden, CT

12 March 2010

 

I miss the roar that I heard in Bangalore..
Bang bang bang, it was fun galore.

We all were possessive of a name called RCB..
For Dr.Mallya gave us a second distillery.

Still we went hammer and tong..
As Shewag tonked us long, long, long.

It was not all just bat and ball..
Kat also joined us in the interval.

With kat and khan the stars were in ground..
There was no dreath of drama when Sree was in town.

Roar, roar, roar, we all had to soar..
For cheering was taken care by the foreign imports.

India’s favourite league is back in town..
Shun the couch and catch the action in the crowd..

Bring it on, become a Couchexpert

Posted: December 30, 2010 by The CouchExpert in IPL

Hemanth Mahadevaiah

My couch, Hamden, CT

11 March 2010

 

This is my first write-up as a true CouchExpert, for I always felt like one. I always had strong views on how and why things are as they are in sports and cricket in particular.

I also have my opinion on why one can be a Couchexpert:

1) You are a couch expert if you think the best of strategies are discussed on the couch and not in the field.
2) You are a couch expert even if you have retired to the couch and cannot play the game anymore.
3) You are a couch expert if you feel tennis ball cricket never got the recognition that it always deserved.
4) You are a couch expert if you have pounded your keyboards many times taking your frustration out in various forums and blogs you write in.

If any of these sounds familiar, you are an expert like me.

Have we not felt we are a better post match analyser of the game than the Shastris and Gavaskars? We can always get as funny as David Lloyds or Boycotts in critisism, and we have as strong an opinion as Peter Roebucks or Ayaz Memons do. Yes we do!

Since we are at the door steps of India’s favourite league, I’d like to share my expert views on who can win the tournament.

The first season was won by a team that was least fancied, bought for the least amount. They not just won the cup, but went about decimating other teams. The second season saw two finalists who were the bottom most rankers in the first season, and won by the lowest ranked team. It’s that funny for it’s T20 for you.

For me, any team that garners a winning momentum in the second half of the tournament can go on to win, no matter what their rank and how many games they have won thus far.

Note that KKR and MI have made some intelligent purchases this year, also they have some very strong domestic players in their rank – Pujara and Nayar heroes this time?

Also to watch out for are the ICL recruits – Vignesh, Iqbal Abdullah and Satish to make a mark, do watch out for these heroes from the rebel league!

Punjab, Bangalore and Royals have been unpredictable for they rely heavily on their big hitting stars – does Pathan, Watson, Marsh, Yuvi and Taylor sound too familiar? Not counting Kallis’s solidity which came to Bangalore’s rescue last time.

Superkings were super solid over the last 2 seasons, but failed at the last hurdle, will they be third time lucky? Or will it be Team Delhi with the strongest batting line-up to make the most of the batting paradises on offer in India? You never know!

In conclusion, I am a true expert and I know the game called 20-20. I’ll have my opinions and not any conclusion. IPL for me is to watch out for players and not for teams, for many players are capable of single handedly winning any match for thier team.